Earlier in the week I mentioned that two companies, Topps Meat and Cargill, were hit by E. coli sparking large recalls in hamburger meat.
Topps Meat was hit so hard the company shut its doors and claimed that it could not possibly recover from such an economic hit.
The FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) agency has noticed greater numbers of positive samples for E coli O157:H7 in May and June, along with a related increase in recalls. The FSIS took a number of steps in June to explore why E coli findings have been increasing, including doubling its E coli sampling in July. The agency didn't find any positives in July, but increased testing continues today.
Richard Raymond, FSIS undersecretary for food safety, said: "We had 3 really good years where the amount of product that we sampled was extremely low as far as coming back positive for E. coli," he said. "Something happened this summer. It's different. It was a high prevalence season, but we saw sample numbers go up, we saw the recall numbers go up, we saw human illnesses attributed to ground beef go up."
He also states that the FSIS is now looking into and examining the efficiency and effectiveness of outbreak investigations related to recalls. The USDA is planning a 2-day seminar, incorporating the input of public health officials at federal, state, and local levels, to discuss ways it can improve the process.
One of the things that officials will cover in the Topps investigation is whether FSIS investigators have the tools, training, data, and oversight to do their jobs, Raymond said. Noting that Investigators have found that Topps Meats' E coli controls were inadequate, and on Sep 26 they suspended raw ground processes at the plant, he said.
The USDA will also do a thorough assessment of whether processors have followed through on the food safety systems they promised to adopt—and whether or not those systems are effective. Some evidence suggests that not all ground beef processors have uniformly applied the USDA policies and that some of the safety programs aren't effective. Another problem, is that the USDA needs to better clarify what the minimum expectations are for the industry.
The National Cattleman's Beef Association also chimed in recently and had some harsh words for processors that don't adhere to established food safety systems. James O. Reagan, chairman of the association's Beef Industry Food Safety Council, said in the statement, "It is unacceptable that even one company was not following commonly accepted safety interventions in place for many years."
Yesterday, Meatingplace.com, a beef industry Web site, published the results of an online survey of its readers on what interventions are needed to contain E coli O157:H7. 63% advocated a test-and-hold system whereby processors hold ground beef shipments until sample test results are confirmed as negative for E coli; 37% opted for diligent disinfection, irradiation, and consumer education.
When asked about mandatory traceability for meat products, 48% supported the idea and 52% opposed it. About 60% doubted that it is possible to trace the source of E coli contamination in ground beef to the original supplier.
I addition to the E. coli recalls associated with beef some Salmonella outbreaks have occurred as of late as well. Today, it was announced that 139 cases of illness are being reported due to Salmonella in 30 states. The Salmonella appears to be traced back to Banquet pot pies, made by ConAgra Foods Inc.
According to a CDC spokesperson the states with the largest numbers of people hit by the salmonella are Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Missouri.Though ConAgra is reporting that its Banquet pot pies are safe if cooked properly, and no recall has been issued as yet the company is recommending people don't eat the Banquet chicken and turkey pot pies. The USDA issued an alert on Tuesday to warn consumers about the outbreak.
If they wish, consumers may return these products to ConAgra Foods for a refund by sending the side panel of the package that contains the code "P-9" to ConAgra Foods, Dept. BQPP, P.O. Box 3768, Omaha, NE 68103-0768. If consumers prefer, they may return the product to the store from which it was purchased for a refund; consumers should discard the product before returning the entire package to their retail store.