Always Remember - Never Forget


How up to date is your business when it comes to assessing your risk exposures, contingency planning, and overall risk management? Now, what would you say if I told you the SEC is requiring ALL publicly traded companies to have a written plan detailing the risks, and how they will respond to climate change?
Even though this occurred back in January of this year, I am finding very few people who have been aware of this new reporting and disclosure requirement.
The other day in my newsletter I mentioned that the SEC had issued interpretive guidance on disclosure related to business or legal developments regarding climate change. The response has been interesting, from laughter, and dismissal, to shock. Some people wondering just how they are supposed to measure the risk and others to say they have zero risks and exposures to it altogether.
Now, I am not currently buying into the man-made climate change side of the equation as I mentioned in the newsletter, and personally believe that these events are cyclical and natural. I also recognize that the issue is basically a political hot potato at the moment, and think most people here in the United States feel the same way I do. Though I admit I could be wrong.
The real story like I stated in my newsletter, is that history shows us that the climate will change, and the impacts of those changes can be dramatic, and have a negative impact on the business community. These impacts can occur whether the climate grows colder or hotter. So, even if it is not man-made, does it matter? The impacts will remain the same.
I am not going to add my assessments here as I did in the newsletter, but I did want to mention it here on Disaster Preparedness Blog for those that may not be aware of this, and provide you the links to the information from the SEC.
Here is a copy of the SEC Press Release on this ruling as well their Interpretive Guidance to the ruling at their respective links.
Specifically, the SEC's interpretative guidance highlights the following areas as examples of where climate change may trigger disclosure requirements:
Impact of Legislation and Regulation: When assessing potential disclosure obligations, a company should consider whether the impact of certain existing laws and regulations regarding climate change is material. In certain circumstances, a company should also evaluate the potential impact of pending legislation and regulation related to this topic.
Impact of International Accords: A company should consider, and disclose when material, the risks or effects on its business of international accords and treaties relating to climate change.
Indirect Consequences of Regulation or Business Trends: Legal, technological, political and scientific developments regarding climate change may create new opportunities or risks for companies. For instance, a company may face decreased demand for goods that produce significant greenhouse gas emissions or increased demand for goods that result in lower emissions than competing products. As such, a company should consider, for disclosure purposes, the actual or potential indirect consequences it may face due to climate change related regulatory or business trends.
Physical Impacts of Climate Change: Companies should also evaluate for disclosure purposes the actual and potential material impacts of environmental matters on their business.
No matter how you look at this issue, here is one other angle to consider. When looking at future risks, be certain to look at how possible future political and regulatory decisions might impact your business.
Recently I mentioned workplace violence and the need to address that issue within the business. Another type of workplace violence on the rise over the last few years is that of the Active Shooter, which is typically, but not always a disgruntled employee, customer, student or even an acquaintance of a current or former employee.
First, what exactly is an Active Shooter? The Department of Homeland Security defines an Active Shooter as: an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area; in most cases, active shooters use firearms and there is no pattern or method to their selection of victims.
Before continuing on we need to clear up some misconceptions about active shooter scenarios and situations. First, it is not a new phenomenon. Active shooter incidents have been occurring for many years, and in the United States as far back as August 1, 1968 at the University of Texas in which 14 people were killed. I am excluding other events, and acts of violence to focus solely on active shooter type events.
Second, if we include Europe, the events go back to June 20, 1913 to an event known as the Bremen school shooting, in Bremen, Germany and in Canada as far back as October 10, 1902 in an incident known as the Altona schoolhouse shooting. So, contrary to popular notion these events are not exclusive to the United States.
Third, not all of these events occur at schools, but schools in particular have had quite a history of active shooter incidents and have security vulnerabilities that are likely to make them targets of future incidents.
What is the intention of the active shooter? The active shooter is often acting out of frustration and rage. They usually see their act as attempting to correct some event they perceive as a wrong that has been committed against them. The active shooter has a desire to kill and usually is not concerned with their own life, safety, or threat of capture. Active shooters will also usually have intended victims and will search them out. Active shooter will accept targets of opportunity while searching for or even after finding their intended victims.
Another thing to know about active shooters is that the active shooter will often move throughout a building or area until either stopped by law enforcement, they commit suicide, or are stopped by other intervention.
The active shooter situation is highly unpredictable and events involving active shooters unfold very quickly often ending within 10 to 15 minutes. This is typically before law enforcement arrives on scene. It is for these reasons that every business and school should be prepared to confront this issue and make it part of their planning process.
It is something most planners and law enforcement officials dread. The active shooter scenario is by many accounts difficult to plan for and often impossible to predict, especially the who, and when. But it is possible to prepare and train for it and even mitigate some of the potential of it occurring if done properly. Another step in preventing this scenario is dealing with work place violence and threats of violence appropriately from the onset as discussed in a previous article: .
What are some other things you can do to deter this event from taking place at your school or business?
What should you do if an active shooter situation does occur where you work or go to school? There are a number of ways to handle the situation, the first and often the best choice is to evacuate.
If you can’t evacuate, the next best option is to hide in a place where the active shooter is not likely to find you. The place you choose to hide should be out of view of the active shooter, provide protection if shots are fired in your direction and should not trap you or restrict your options for movement. When hiding be sure to do the following.
Lastly, if evacuation and hiding are not options, as a last resort and only as a last resort, you can attempt to take action against the active shooter. You can do this by taking the following actions.
Once the police arrive on scene to an active shooter incident they will likely take action using the Immediate Action Rapid Deployment (IARD) so it is possible only one or a small team of police officers may enter the area or building the active shooter is in. In the past it was common for the police to wait for a SWAT team, but these incidents take place so fast, additional action was needed and IARD was developed in response to active shooter situations.
Be aware that police officers arriving on scene will be heavily armed, possibly with rifles and shotguns and may be wearing heavy outer bulletproof vests, helmets, and other tactical equipment. Be prepared for the police to take the following actions.
Here are some things you should do when law enforcement arrives on the scene.
If you are able to successfully call 911 and speak with a dispatcher be prepared to answer the following questions.
This is a fairly long list of things you should be aware of during any active shooting incident, and yet it is only just touching on the issue. One of the most important things is that you prepare, train, and if you can, involve local law enforcement and emergency personnel into your planning.
Active Shooter Video
When Seconds Count: Stopping Active Shooters
Most people consider their place of work safe and free from violence. No one really wants to think that when they leave for work they will have to confront verbal abuse, threats, or deal with physical assaults and homicide. However, workplace violence is a growing problem and concern for both employers and employees nationwide.
In fact, according to OSHA, two million Americans are victims of workplace violence every year. People who work in certain professions also face an increased risk of violence. These professions include anyone who exchanges money with the public; delivers passengers, goods or services; people who work alone or in small groups; healthcare workers, social service workers, probation workers, gas and utility workers, phone and cable TV installers, letter carriers, and retail workers.
Employers need to consider workplace violence as having the potential of happening in their office or place of business, and also need to educate employees on how to handle such issues. For instance, the employer should establish a workplace violence prevention program, and ensure that all employees know the policy and have that policy within an employee handbook.
Some things the policy should contain is a policy to carry only a minimal amount of money, make drops into the safe often. Also avoid traveling alone and avoid unfamiliar locations and situations when possible. Be sure to call the police after any violent incident, and keep a log book to document what happened.
Employers should also have policies in place to secure the workplace to prevent and deter any potential violence by having surveillance cameras, extra lighting, alarm systems, security guards, identification badges and if possible electronic key cards for building access.
There are a great many more things to include in your policies and training but this should get you started. For more information on workplace violence be sure to visit:
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/workplaceviolence/
And review the OSHA fact sheet on workplace violence.
I have another article coming up shortly which confronts a specific workplace violence issue – The Active Shooter.
In the midst of a record heat wave, which has caused the deaths of approximately 700 people per day, and droughts causing a food crisis, Russia is battling a series of wildfires which have decimated entire villages and communities. Though initial reports have denied that any military bases were in danger, the latest news is that at least one large base was destroyed, along with several aircraft and equipment at the base.
The fires have also threatened a number of nuclear facilities and research centers which are closed to foreigners and can only be accessed by special permits. Though officials are saying that the fires are now under control and the facilities are no longer in danger, unconfirmed and unofficial reports are that facilities that housed nuclear weapons, and possibly chemical and biological weapons have already been destroyed and radiation levels around Moscow are on the rise.
Officially, even though the facilities have been destroyed they are saying all nuclear materials and weapons were removed from the supply depot. Also, Russian official s are telling everyone to leave Moscow if they can due to increased risk of carbon monoxide and other pollutants. One official, Onishchenko, is telling people "Those who can should take a break from work or away on vacation." Tens of thousands have left the city, including many high ranking Russian state officials.
Reports in Moscow of embassy closings are making headlines including a travel warning issued by the United States Department of State citing “hazardous air quality.” Local businesses have been hit hard since many employees are fleeing the city and JP Morgan Chase & Alfa Bank, Russia’s biggest private lender, canceled daily research reports as many of their workers have fled or opted to stay home. Some 104,000 people left the city just yesterday alone.
The fire is likely to continue to burn for several months in some areas where peat bogs caught fire and can smolder for long periods until heavy rains return to the region. Villagers in some of these areas are complaining that they had to battle the fires themselves without help or fire trucks and outrage is growing where entire villages once considered a paradise have been completely burnt to the ground.
Video from RT
Another Video from RT
For more please view the references below.
My name is Keith Erwood, and disasters are my life. Well, not just disasters really, but to help people like you, owners, executives and managers of businesses prepare for disasters and emergencies.
You can connect with me via social media sites at Facebook - LinkedIn - Twitter.